Taxmora

Last updated · English · free calculator

Arrival regimes are sold as a rate. They are better understood as a period, because every one of them has a statutory end date and the year it stops is the year your take-home pay falls. The fall is not a rounding error: on the numbers below it is the largest single change most people will experience in their net pay outside a job loss.

Engine output: annual net take-home in the final year of the regime and in the first year after it ends, same salary, single, no children. Spain uses 2025 parameters (Madrid), Portugal 2026 parameters (provisional), the Netherlands 2026 parameters.
CaseLast year under the regimeFirst year after it endsAnnual drop
Netherlands — €60,000 (ends after year 5)€47,259€39,347−€7,912
Netherlands — €80,000€61,105€50,468−€10,637
Netherlands — €120,000€88,488€70,668−€17,820
Spain — €60,000 (ends after year 6)€41,783€41,179−€604
Spain — €80,000€56,983€52,902−€4,081
Spain — €120,000€87,383€75,702−€11,681
Portugal — €60,000 (ends after year 10)€41,400€35,082−€6,318
Portugal — €80,000€55,200€43,962−€11,238
Portugal — €120,000€82,800€59,588−€23,212

Two patterns are worth extracting. The first is that the cliff scales with salary, because these regimes all replace a progressive schedule with something flatter, and a flat rate helps more the higher you climb. The second is that the size of the cliff depends on how harsh the country’s standard regime is, not on how good the special one looks. Portugal’s IFICI charges 20% flat, which sounds generous next to the Dutch 30% ruling, yet its expiry costs €23,212 at €120,000 — the steepest of the three — because the standard Portuguese schedule it returns you to reaches 48%, while the 11% employee contribution applied either way.

Why the Dutch cliff is the one people misjudge

The 30% ruling removes 30% of gross from the Box 1 base, so the end of the ruling is not “30% more tax” and it is not a change of rate. It is the difference between taxing 70% of your salary and taxing all of it through a progressive schedule in which the upper brackets are already biting. At €80,000 that difference is €10,637 a year, about €886 a month — usually more than the raise people hope to negotiate to offset it, and it arrives in January without a payslip explanation.

What “year 6” means in each country

What you can do with a number this predictable

The rare advantage of this problem is that the date is known years in advance and the arithmetic does not depend on markets. That supports a few concrete moves, none of which this page can decide for you:

What this article does not model

Frequently asked questions

Does my Dutch five-year clock pause if I change jobs?
No. A new employer can continue the ruling, but it does not restart the period. The clock runs from the first working day of the grant, and job changes, leave and absence do not stop it.
Can I just reapply for the 30% ruling when it ends?
Not as a renewal of the same grant. The ruling is awarded for a maximum period; when that period is used up, a later return to the Netherlands is assessed under whatever conditions exist at that time. Do not plan on a second run.
Is the Spanish cliff really only €604 at €60,000?
Yes, on our 2025 Madrid figures. Beckham is a flat 24%, and at €60,000 the progressive schedule with its lower brackets is barely worse than a flat rate on the whole salary. The regime earns its keep above €80,000, which is also where losing it hurts.
Why is the Portuguese drop the biggest when its rate looks the lowest?
Because the comparison is not the headline rate but the standard regime you return to. Portugal’s standard schedule reaches 48% and its 11% employee contribution applies with no ceiling either way, so the expiry undoes the largest improvement — €23,212 a year at €120,000 on our provisional 2026 figures.

Run the numbers yourself

One salary, five countries, ten seconds - the same engine this article describes, free and without signup.